My favorite technology writer is David Pogue of the New York Times. He brings a personality and depth of knowledge to his work that surpasses anything else I read. (Plus, my kids know every word to his "I got an iPhone" ditty.)
But he's becoming a brand all his own, which leads people to raise questions about conflicts of interest. Those questions hit the page of the public editor today.
What do you think? In an age when information is so fragmented and people have to innovate and expand to build revenue streams, how do we avoid conflicts of interest? Can we? Is the appearance of a conflict as bad as a conflict itself? What if Pogue weren't writing about tech and instead, say, politics? Would it be OK for him to put out books on different people?
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Conflicts of Interest
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I believe it is okay for him to have a personal bias in his technology articles but this would not be acceptable in the case of hard news stories. Though both of these genres are meant to convey information, a "conflict of interest" could weigh more heavily in more hearty issues.
Post a Comment