Business Week's global brands issue has an excellent piece on marketing and trust. It's well worth a read.
Also check out their ranking of the 100 best brands. Interesting insights.
What is the balance between a company's obligation to consumers and to shareholders? What social responsibilities do brands have?
For instance, this is "Go Big Read" time, where hundreds on campus are reading Michael Pollan's "In Defense of Food" and its indictment of food marketing. Kellogg's is Business Week's 34th best brand. What is its obligation to feed children nutritionally valuable products? If they build the brand and make shareholders money by marketing sugary cereals, is that OK? Why or why not? How can consumers influence large brands?
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Brands and trust
Posted by
Katy Culver
at
11:01 AM
0
comments
Labels: branding, ethics roundup, social responsibility
Friday, February 6, 2009
Kellogg Dumping Phelps
The bong hit that continues to haunt:
http://adage.com/article?article_id=134363
Michael Phelps loses an endorsement deal, what may the first in a line.
What is a celebrity's responsibility to the clients that hire him as a face for their brand? What is his responsibility to the public in general? How serious was this mistake? How seriously should he pay for it?
Posted by
Katy Culver
at
6:00 AM
8
comments
Labels: advertising, branding, endorsement, ethics roundup, media ethics
Friday, January 30, 2009
Super Bowl Ads and the Blogosphere
Looks like the recession may cutting into chatter about the upcoming Super Bowl ads. Discussions are down, according to Ad Age and others.
What does this mean for these spots? Does it make the massive investment less worth it? How much does this buzz help a brand?
Posted by
Katy Culver
at
5:47 AM
1 comments
Labels: ad age, advertising, blogs, branding, super bowl
Monday, February 11, 2008
What's Your Candidate?
Great blog addition from a 202er this morning:
_________
Hi Katy,
I found this story through the NY Times and it reminded me a lot about today's lecture and the several Mac vs. PC examples we heard today. I thought you might find it interesting how these technologies are becoming representations for entire genres, demographics, styles, etc. and how one writer used them to contrast Obama and Clinton in this article.
_________
What do you think? Do the styles of the two platforms fit the styles of the two candidates? And then what would John McCain and Mike Huckabee be? We've talked about branding in marketing. How are the candidates brands faring in your opinion?
Posted by
Katy Culver
at
8:46 PM
2
comments
Labels: apple, branding, new york times, politics